Harris interview with Fox News showcases a change in strategy for Democrats with network

Source: SnarkiSnail

24 Comments

  1. PopeHonkersXII on

    I’m fine with them talking to the few reasonably good journalists that they still have. It’s the Hannity types that can go suck an egg 

  2. lifeisweirdmydude on

    I cannot with this clown interviewing her. We’re less than 10 minutes in, and he’s interrupted her probably two dozen times already.

  3. HardToBeatRichard on

    Their strategy is always talking over her and interrupting her and not letting her finish. I can tell you from first hand experience that most Republicans do this. Don’t let the intelligent people speak in an attempt to sound smart in comparison.

  4. ranchoparksteve on

    The interviewer is stepping on every answer, so I’m not sure what the point is. It could have been a decent interview.

  5. Let’s be honest: any answer she gives is gonna be 1000-fold better than what anything Trump will give because it’s more substantive to begin with.

    Let’s not be too hard on her or even Bret. Bret is doing his best to satisfy Fox and others by interjecting once in a while. But he does let her speak when she needs to speak.

    We know most of MAGA won’t be watching this anyway out of spite.

    To me the win is the fact that she’s breaking through onto their turf.

  6. Southern-Detail1334 on

    Shows you just how scared Trump is of debating Harris a second time.

    He wouldn’t even do a Fox-moderated debate – the same place that interviewed Harris and didn’t even let her finish a sentence.

  7. geologicalnoise on

    What they just showed from the Fox interview showed her not taking any shit and clarifying what actually happened (Carrot Caligula threatening the “enemy within” with the US army against the public) versus the cherry picked bullshit Baier tried to spin on her.

    She got aggressive but maintained her class. Well done.

  8. BannedAgainDude on

    The strategy: coherent, focused, grounded and coming with receipts. They tried to take her down and the DA came out.

    Get em Kam!

  9. terrastrawberra on

    The beginning on immigration started off rough. She had her normal answers, he stepped all over her interrupting her and she was getting (rightfully) annoyed.

    She landed it with the enemy within comments

  10. She didn’t give them *any* material to work with. She owned Brett Baier – put a collar around his neck, clipped on a leash, and walked him around the block. It was cringe to watch him flailing during the interview. You know that she dominated when Fox isn’t even showing many excepts. They’re just talking about it incredulously.

  11. SoundSageWisdom on

    I find it offensive that they let Donald Trump ramble on and lie, and don’t interrupt or cut him off the way they did with her

  12. Dude just spoke over her as much as he could. Felt like he was trying to minimize how much she could say because the audience might hear ideas that were verboten.

  13. Who else wants the Harris campaign to post about the interview being the highest rated interview ever on Fox (if it was) just to trigger Trump?

  14. General-Cover-4981 on

    They need to stop running and hiding from their core platforms which are popular with most people

  15. She did win in a sense: being visiblr to the very few “magaots” that blindly listen to Trump who will realise she is not evil, not a Marxist and they even may think she is not that bad a human person. As Trump used “They” to instillate paranoia as a communication weapon, seeing her on their preferred network could be beneficial.

  16. She handled herself well during the interview, despite the interviewer being rude and frequently interrupting her. It seemed like he talked more than she did, which made them appear intimidated by her. It’s good to see the media beginning to address Trump’s mental decline.

Leave A Reply