This submission source is likely to have a soft paywall. If this article is not behind a paywall please report this for “breaks r/politics rules -> custom -> “incorrect flair””. [More information can be found here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/index/#wiki_paywalls)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*
BlotchComics on
They still won’t unless Trump wins.
_attractivegarbage on
It’s not even this that I’m worried about, it’s the voter purge that all these states are conveniently doing. And I can’t imagine the percentage of those purged voter rolls that are democrat.
I_Lick_Bananas on
Crosby and Judd out in AZ are still walking free 2 years after they refused. Their trial just got delayed until January 2025. These two a$$hats are still on the 3-member board of supervisors and will be responsible for certifying the elections next month.
Trey5027 on
I knew this was going to get shot down in court but I didn’t expect it so quickly. Letting random unelected salaried workers have equal/more power than judges was never going to happen
dust-ranger on
The new thing going on is states like VA(?) making rules that they will withhold their electors if any other states are in question. I believe TX will get on this bandwagon. The goal is to create a domino effect of “election integrity issues” that leads to widespread unrest and the vote going to the House/SC.
AnamCeili on
The fact that a ruling from a judge was even necessary is absolutely fucking *mind-boggling*.
This country has sunk so far. Hopefully Harris and Walz can bring us back from the brink — especially if they get a Democratic House and Senate as well!
User4C4C4C on
How are these board members replaced if they go to jail, say for not certifying? Governor?
Inevitable-Tone-8595 on
I can predict the R playbook now.
They plan to refuse to certify, but if this goes through and are forced to:
They will still refuse.
They may face penalties of some kind or arrest for refusing.
Republicans will go on social media and spin it and create a narrative that they are arresting election officials to steal the election.
Fake news will get out of control and rile up another angry mob who think that stopping Trump from trying to steal the election is authoritarian election fixing.
cheesifiedd on
oh corruption.
Buckus93 on
So, can the judge just start throwing the board members in jail until they decide to certify?
Puzzled_Pain6143 on
Of course courts’ role is to restrain democrats, as republicans will ignore them as usual.
12 Comments
This submission source is likely to have a soft paywall. If this article is not behind a paywall please report this for “breaks r/politics rules -> custom -> “incorrect flair””. [More information can be found here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/index/#wiki_paywalls)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*
They still won’t unless Trump wins.
It’s not even this that I’m worried about, it’s the voter purge that all these states are conveniently doing. And I can’t imagine the percentage of those purged voter rolls that are democrat.
Crosby and Judd out in AZ are still walking free 2 years after they refused. Their trial just got delayed until January 2025. These two a$$hats are still on the 3-member board of supervisors and will be responsible for certifying the elections next month.
I knew this was going to get shot down in court but I didn’t expect it so quickly. Letting random unelected salaried workers have equal/more power than judges was never going to happen
The new thing going on is states like VA(?) making rules that they will withhold their electors if any other states are in question. I believe TX will get on this bandwagon. The goal is to create a domino effect of “election integrity issues” that leads to widespread unrest and the vote going to the House/SC.
The fact that a ruling from a judge was even necessary is absolutely fucking *mind-boggling*.
This country has sunk so far. Hopefully Harris and Walz can bring us back from the brink — especially if they get a Democratic House and Senate as well!
How are these board members replaced if they go to jail, say for not certifying? Governor?
I can predict the R playbook now.
They plan to refuse to certify, but if this goes through and are forced to:
They will still refuse.
They may face penalties of some kind or arrest for refusing.
Republicans will go on social media and spin it and create a narrative that they are arresting election officials to steal the election.
Fake news will get out of control and rile up another angry mob who think that stopping Trump from trying to steal the election is authoritarian election fixing.
oh corruption.
So, can the judge just start throwing the board members in jail until they decide to certify?
Of course courts’ role is to restrain democrats, as republicans will ignore them as usual.