’60 Minutes’ details Trump canceling  primetime interview

Source: elliottbaytrail

34 Comments

  1. >“They also insisted on doing live fact-checking, which is unprecedented,” he added.

    Oh no, live fact checking! The horror! What a fucking clown world we live in.

  2. ReifiedNothingness on

    > “A week ago, Trump backed out,” Pelley said. “The campaign offered shifting explanations. First, it complained that we would fact check the interview. We fact check every story.”

    Lies are all he has.

  3. jojointheflesh on

    Election Day can’t come soon enough. Let’s fucking bury this traitorous fuck and move on from this shit

  4. >“They also insisted on doing live fact-checking, which is unprecedented,” he added.

    Right because it’s also unprecedented that the interviewee will blatantly lie with every sentence.

  5. He’s running scared. He is making several plans to disrupt the election by incitement of violence, and having State legislatures vote on slates of electors…bypassing voters. With the bought-and-paid-for Supreme Court to make rulings in his favor.

    He is also making plans to flee the country if he fails.

  6. He was to busy trading political favors for money and hanging out with elite billionaires like Elon Musk

    Hypocritical Politician

  7. Static-Stair-58 on

    That Nazi wannabe claiming that 60 Minutes was actually begging Trump to do an interview. These people are so disingenuous and soulless, they care nothing for our country. Woe to the vanquished if we lose in November indeed.

  8. Designer_Buy_1650 on

    If you watched the 60 minutes program tonight, you got to see how Trump has literally brainwashed people into believing in him. I truly believe he might be the AntiChrist. He and his cult are pure evil.

  9. Senior-Proof4899 on

    Trump’s campaign knows the truth:

    The more people see of Trump, the less likely they are to vote for him

  10. > “It’s been a tradition for more than half a century that the major party candidates sit down with 60 Minutes in October,” Pelley said.

    > “60 Minutes begged for an interview, even after they were caught lying about Hunter Biden’s laptop back in 2020,” Cheung said when it was first announced Trump would not join the program. “There were initial discussions, but nothing was ever scheduled or locked in.”

    Ya, I’m sure they begged you to do something that’s been done for 50 years. Fuck these losers.

  11. Fusion_allthebonds on

    So Steven Cheung admits they’re lying. Scared of being “fact checked” AKA “called out on their BS.”

  12. Raspberries-Are-Evil on

    Im sorry, CNN fact checking is, “well there is no evidence of that…anyway lets move on…”

    They never fucking make them own it.

  13. HIVnotAdeathSentence on

    >“60 Minutes” offered a lengthy on-air explanation to viewers Monday for why former President Trump declined to participate in the program’s traditional interviews it has with presidential candidates ahead of the election.

    >The news program addressed the cancellation ahead of an interview with Vice President Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), as part of a prime-time special. In its opening segment, Scott Pelley, who was set to interview Trump for the same special, went into a detailed timeline about how Trump’s campaign at first agreed to appear then pulled out.

    Meanwhile Harris’ interview went off with no problem. Though it seems weird there is little coverage of it.

    Was Harris’ 60 Minutes interview that bad that Trump backing out is getting more attention?

  14. SoundSageWisdom on

    Jesus Christ Donald Trump needs to be held on a 5150 psych hold. Enough of this insanity

  15. Person being interviewed being asked to substantiate the answers to their questions is “fact-checking”.

    It’s the evolution of “alternative facts”.

    They want to stay their alternative facts and not have them questioned. 

  16. I get it that some people just can’t vote democratic – but if you wanna get elected, maybe don’t put up a pathological liar / psychopath?

Leave A Reply