Restrictive interventions are legal and necessary in many circumstances. What’s the context here? How do we know these are unlawful cases?
Electrical-College-6 on
Surely a reasonable person would be aware of the potential for abuse of both recipients and carers.
This should be a strong reason for all carers to require registration, so the government has oversight and accountability if they are acting improperly.
Abusive recipients need some kind of deterrant as well, at least where they have the comprehension to know right from wrong. Currently acting in an anti-social manner will lead to more funding/support and being placed as a sole occupant instead of in a share house. Perverse incentives are one of the biggest problems with the NDIS.
2 Comments
Restrictive interventions are legal and necessary in many circumstances. What’s the context here? How do we know these are unlawful cases?
Surely a reasonable person would be aware of the potential for abuse of both recipients and carers.
This should be a strong reason for all carers to require registration, so the government has oversight and accountability if they are acting improperly.
Abusive recipients need some kind of deterrant as well, at least where they have the comprehension to know right from wrong. Currently acting in an anti-social manner will lead to more funding/support and being placed as a sole occupant instead of in a share house. Perverse incentives are one of the biggest problems with the NDIS.