> The only worker who was tested for the virus had negative results, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said.
Not a very comforting sample size, but at least a comforting result?
thegreentiger0484 on
I mean, the infected do not seem to be at a 50% mortality rate at least… right?…right?!
EricThePerplexed on
October surprise arrived early.
mastersheeef on
Bird flu is not Covid folks. Its kill rate is too quick, and thus it wouldn’t be as impactful as you think.
Source: I identify as a virologist scientist Ivy League doctor person.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
Next_Conference1933 on
“The CDC continues to caution that the risk to the general public remains low.”
yeah and in January 2020 i remember hearing the cdc say something similar along the lines of: The CDC continues to caution that the risk to the general public in the United States and nearby countries remains low as almost all cases are concentrated near wuhan china…
10 Comments
Health care workers are always the first exposed
Human-to-human transmission? Rut-roh
Less than ideal
Bird flu in cows is scary
> The only worker who was tested for the virus had negative results, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said.
Not a very comforting sample size, but at least a comforting result?
I mean, the infected do not seem to be at a 50% mortality rate at least… right?…right?!
October surprise arrived early.
Bird flu is not Covid folks. Its kill rate is too quick, and thus it wouldn’t be as impactful as you think.
Source: I identify as a virologist scientist Ivy League doctor person.
[deleted]
“The CDC continues to caution that the risk to the general public remains low.”
yeah and in January 2020 i remember hearing the cdc say something similar along the lines of: The CDC continues to caution that the risk to the general public in the United States and nearby countries remains low as almost all cases are concentrated near wuhan china…