Key Nebraska Republican opposes changing how the state awards electoral votes, blocking Trump push

Source: nbcnews

38 Comments

  1. It’s rare when a Republican stands up for principle over party *while in office*, so we should give big credit every time it happens. Even if we’re still gonna vote against that person next election.

  2. Excellent news. So tired of MAGAt loyaltist attempting last minute ratfucking the election process. Glad a Republican actually stood up to them while still in office, rather than waiting for retirement to speak out.

  3. It’s not principle. Based on the earlier reporting he wants to be mayor of Omaha and that is basically impossible if he votes for this. 

  4. ramblershambler on

    After this election – when Harris cleans Trump’s clock – the GOP is going to realize they are never going to win another presidential election again with the Electoral College in it’s current form – but they can win IF all states switched to awarding electoral college votes by congressional districts. SO – the Republicans will be sorry they tried this manuever because it’s not in their best interest.

  5. Thanks Mike, for having the balls to stand up and say to Trump and his goons that “Fuck you, your blatant attempts at interference aren’t gonna work and I am not standing for this shit.”.

    Look, I know it was probably for votes in Omaha and all, but still, good on you for doing this.

    Trump is probably gonna be VERY pissed off with Lindsey Graham and his cohorts, for not getting him what he wanted.

  6. For those wondering, this potentially makes it easier if Harris lost Nevada to still get to 270. Basically, Trump now needs to pick off one of Wisconsin, Michigan, or Pennsylvania to even have a mathematical shot.

  7. This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/key-nebraska-republican-opposes-changing-state-awards-electoral-votes-rcna172276) reduced by 85%. (I’m a bot)
    *****
    > A Nebraska Republican state lawmaker said Monday that he remains opposed to switching how the state allocates its electoral votes – a blow to former President Donald Trump and his allies, who are seeking the change in a bid for an extra electoral vote this fall.

    > If Vice President Kamala Harris were to win Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin but lose every other swing state, she and Trump would be tied at 269 Electoral College votes under a winner-take-all setup in Nebraska with Trump winning the state.

    > Last week, Sen Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a Trump ally, met with Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen and about two dozen Republican legislators to discuss how the state allocates its electoral votes, according to a source with direct knowledge of the trip.

    *****
    [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/1fns3pq/key_nebraska_republican_opposes_changing_how_the/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ “Version 2.02, ~694221 tl;drs so far.”) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr “PM’s and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.”) | *Top* *keywords*: **state**^#1 **vote**^#2 **Nebraska**^#3 **electoral**^#4 **change**^#5

  8. Fuck Lindsay Graham and his election interference. That piece of shit should be locked up for his aiding and abetting his Fuhrer. What does DonOld have on Graham?

  9. Changing the rules is questionable in general but changing it right before the election when the party’s candidate is behind is absolutely unbelievable

  10. jamarchasinalombardi on

    Smart play. What would happen in Nebraska if they made the change and were singlehandedly responsible for Trumps second term?

    Nebraska would be inviting domestic terrorism on a scale to which we have never seen before. All the best people are saying it …

  11. Do we think it is because this cat can tell that DJT is more likely to lose than win? My pessimism meter is broken since 2020.

  12. Interesting-Olive842 on

    Can you imagine changing the rules in your state just because you don’t like how a large number of people are likely to vote? There was no other reason to propose this change other than to deliberately cancel out votes.

  13. This was inevitable.

    There will still be a party after trump, and putting all their eggs in a broken basket is obviously stupid.

    There are a lot of state level and national pols that are staring at nothing but downside by further altering the rules in an obvious attempt to favor a single candidate. If they bend and break every rule available – and still lose – they’re going to be staring at a generation of voters that only view the Republican Party as craven cretins that tried to screw over their country to put trump in power when he couldn’t win on his own.

  14. It’s like watching evolution. Note that the vertebrate republican is no longer afraid of being consumed by its invertebrate cousins?

  15. This is very good news. If they wanna change shit they shouldn’t do it in an election year. That’s just beyond stupid. And to wait until Maine can no longer change its rules is a move totally devoid of any integrity. Do it after the election if you like. But fuck off for this one.

    But to be clear both methods are stupid.

    Winner take all sucks.

    And the Nebraska/Maine method on the surface sounds better because it’s at the district level but with gerrymandering the way it is it would be an even worse system to implement nationwide.

    Overall both systems suck. The best thing would be to just implement the national popular vote interstate compact but we are not there yet.

    The other better option is to proportionally award electors in each state by % of votes won.

  16. Will Maine proceed to do the same if Nebraska next year does this, though? Basically reverting things to normal?

  17. It seems like there’s often just one pivotal person blocking these election subversion attempts. It’s frightening. Attempting to change the rules of the election 40ish days out is crazy.

  18. It feels like the Tennessee Suffrage vote. Came down to one man and his conscious, and it changed history.

    While I am not sure this will “Change history” but I hope to prevents history being made.

  19. OhhhTAINTedCruuuuz on

    Motives aside, I’m sure he could’ve gotten himself a deal the push the thing through. Let’s celebrate for now but I’ll be watching you COUNSELOR

Leave A Reply