so could be palatable to the electorate and he should of offered it.
Media hates them no matter what he does so could of maybe got them on board with giving them the NG bone.
CGT will have the ppl who want to vote liberal,but can’t stomach a wannabe fascist so voted for albo instead running for the hills
whateverworksforben on
ALP won’t get behind changed to. CGT or negative gearing, because the second they do, broken promise will be blasted out from Dutton and echoed through every news outlet in the country.
Greens can say they want to negotiate but by putting forward non negotiable in CGT and negative gearing, they aren’t really negotiating.
Same is in 2009 when they blocked climate legislation then, it’s more about saying you want to make change than actually doing it.
2 Comments
I mean negative gearing being changed to 1 property
>Six in 10 Australians now support abolishing negative gearing altogether, YouGov found.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-08/housing-poll-yougov-negative-gearing-borrow-super-market-value/104321750Support rises to about seven in 10 among those under 50 and those who voted for Labor at the last election, with Coalition voters evenly split (51 per cent support).
so could be palatable to the electorate and he should of offered it.
Media hates them no matter what he does so could of maybe got them on board with giving them the NG bone.
CGT will have the ppl who want to vote liberal,but can’t stomach a wannabe fascist so voted for albo instead running for the hills
ALP won’t get behind changed to. CGT or negative gearing, because the second they do, broken promise will be blasted out from Dutton and echoed through every news outlet in the country.
Greens can say they want to negotiate but by putting forward non negotiable in CGT and negative gearing, they aren’t really negotiating.
Same is in 2009 when they blocked climate legislation then, it’s more about saying you want to make change than actually doing it.