Kamala Harris ‘Dominated’ Bret Baier in Fox News Interview—Speechwriter for Ronald Reagan

Source: Titus_Roman_Emperor

25 Comments

  1. And yet, the conservive media and commenters here on Reddit are insisting that she didn’t answer any questions and just looked defensive and combative.

  2. LastDaysCultist on

    Harris is the president we all deserve. If elected, she will do wonders politically for this country.

    We need to leave our bibles and hate behind and move towards a modern day country.

  3. She was magnificent given the situation and the conditions. Magnificent. She rode him like like the rodeo pig he was and, while it wasn’t always pretty – just like a rodeo – she never broke a sweat. And now, she’s got the replay video she needs for the Bullshit Brahman and his posse of Rodeo Clowns.

  4. nobodysfrienemy on

    The secondhand embarrassment I got from kamala was off the charts. She didn’t dominate anything. She threw a fit when she couldn’t get away with not answering the questions asked. I almost felt bad for her, seeing how far she was in over her head.

  5. Bret wouldn’t stop talking long enough to to get to the end of questions; she would have to talk over him to get an answer in on her own interview.

  6. Hot_Detective_9472 on

    I’m confident the important independent voters now see her as continuing her current bosses policies!

  7. Baier was born in 1970 and Reagan exited in 1989.

    That’s how this biased clickbait title reads. Too many errors in this Newsweek piece. Not the same Newsweek of yore.

    Doubt he was a speechwriter for Reagan. Or maybe he wrote Reagan’s rambling dementia talk at the All-Star game.

  8. rabbitdude2000 on

    What’s amusing is her stupid response trying to say that presidential races are always tight. Ronald Reagan 84 wasn’t tight. And Bret is a dumbass and failed to capitalize on her mistake:

    If Donald Trump is so obviously dangerous, then shouldn’t she win by a landslide like Reagan? **If not, then the argument she’s making is that Donald Trump would be a better president than Walter Mondale.**

    Does she think Walter Mondale was dangerous and unstable? Apparently much worse.

    Bret: you say Trump is dangerous and unstable, why does half the country support him?

    Kamala: Because Trump is a significantly better candidate than Walter Mondale and that’s why I’m not going to win a 49 state landslide, but he’s also dangerous and unstable.

    What a stupid interview

  9. Im hearing from coworkers today how she dodged every question and bombed. I didn’t watch it myself.

  10. It’s funny how few months ago youtube proposed a “Don’t fold” videos ofr hiphop reactions and now they’ve turned to be only political, pro Trump reactions. Their videos are so weird, and conslusions so shallow, like, “she doesn’t want to grant loams to only black poor people, but to all poor people! she isn’t doing anything for vlack people”. It’s actually scarry how different reactions for Harris’s inyerviews are between reddit and some pro-trump vlogs…

  11. I wouldn’t say that at all. She held her own, but not dominated. They were combative, talking over each other. She should have slowed down and given some better answers. I can understand how anxious a person must be waiting for the ridiculous questions Fox would throw at them, like the transgender convicts one. But to his credit he was asking things the conservative base was interested in.

    It was a win in that she didn’t crumble and didn’t really leave them with any negative talking points. I just think how Pete Buttigeg would have ran circles around Brett.

Leave A Reply