ABC ‘whistleblower’ hoaxster returns with sloppy attempt to frame Tim Walz

Source: dailydot

26 Comments

  1. The suspect Twitter account @ Docnetyoutube blew up allegations that ABC fixed the presidential debate for Kamala Harris, an accusation that made its way all the way up to the president.

    Now, they’re back with an account of abuse allegations against Tim Walz, but the story is full of holes.

  2. They’ve got nothing so they have to make up complete lies.

    The desperation would be comical if it wasn’t so GD close.

  3. Proud3GenAthst on

    Was looking forward to see it here. You know it’s horseshit when it took so long to take off and not even fringe right publications take it seriously.

  4. ChanceryTheRapper on

    After an Indigo Girls concert. Okay. Sure. Definitely not a detail thrown in by someone who’s like, “Uhhh, shit, uh, some fuckin’ gay band from the 90s… Indigo Girls! Yeah!”

  5. throwneverywhichway on

    I can’t believe that a twitter account called Docnetyoutube might not be legit. I’m gonna need to hear it from Profcybertiktok.

  6. He is so overly cryptic, and uses the guise of being thorough to excuse why he has still not posted a shred of actual evidence beyond an accusation. He posted the minutes of a school board meeting where they accepted the walzs resignation. But that proves nothing without the meeting being about this particular alleged case. He claims there was some secret meeting, to which I say “show receipts”.

    It’s hard to take him seriously when he’s so slow and overly cryptic. Also, there are blatant formatting inconsistencies in the emails that Twitter users have pointed out, even between his own emails.

    Unfortunately, it’s hard to disprove a claim like this, given walz DID take a student to a concert (this his wife has talked about). So the question is, did he do anything inappropriate?

    You might be able to say “the accuser said that he had a tattoo on his thigh, so that can prove or disprove”. Honestly, that doesn’t mean anything either. If he has it, the person could know about it because he said he had it to his class. (Students sometimes ask teachers if they have any tats). If he doesn’t, maga will just scream that he had it removed to cover evidence.

    Given the abc lies the guy already told, I sincerely doubt this is true. Walz should be given the benefit of the doubt, and if it is actually proven then he should face consequences.

  7. Fear. They are always attempting to sew or sell fear and now it’s just an obvious sign of desperation. The religious Right are already irrational so it’s a going to be an emotional downhill from here on out.

  8. Meanwhile there’s actual court documents about Trump’s rape of a 13-year-old girl, and it’s been crickets from MAGA.

  9. ButtholeCharles on

    This is just.. desperation. The right keeps trying to make any scandal they can fabricate stick to Tim or Kamala, meanwhile their candidate is full on loading his pants with shit while speaking at an event.

    Whatever.

  10. radicalindependence on

    >The clearly false claims stem from the prolific work of one man, a Twitter conspiracy peddler who goes by Black Insurrectionist. After previously pushing a lie about a presidential debate “whistleblower,” he’s at it again, and even his clownish mistakes haven’t kept the claims from taking off on Twitter, or being promoted by automated sections of the news ecosystem.

  11. As soon as I found out he had been a coach I knew this would become an inevitable smear attempt.

  12. Dapper-Membership on

    They were “form” a source! What a fucking loser… these people need to get a damn life.

  13. redrocketredglare on

    This is high school level PR bullshit. A dude heard from a dude from the girlfriend’s cousin that they saw Walz at 31 flavors last night. It must be serious.

  14. Giving this airtime over Trump/Vance continued rhetoric, extremism, and etc *crickets*. We need more laws in place to make the media less clickbait bullshit and full propaganda; it’s literally getting people killed.

Leave A Reply