You mean “excessively harsh” for men and not care squat for women.
Lex2882 on
Cave dwellers.
Ren_dom on
No. It would not.
uncrushable on
How wild is it that a nuclear armed country still has such an archaic legal system?
Coast_watcher on
Then you lose the right to go around lecturing other countries till you do.
[deleted] on
[removed]
MinuQu on
Talking about something being harsh? How about being the victim of martial rape and not being able to do anything about it.
222Czar on
Wtf is it with India and rape? It’s like there’s another horrific story every other week. Is this a media bias thing or is that region really deranged for some reason? Genuine question.
shamrockabc on
No means no.
Yes means yes.
India: But, what does it mean tho?
PineBNorth85 on
What a backwards country.
MrBoomBox69 on
This is a terrible ruling.
While marital rape is still penalized fairly severely, I don’t understand the logic behind not allowing it to be reclassified as rape (*which carries even more significant consequences*). That is how it should be.
If you have a generation of men and women that aren’t literate enough to understand basic consent norms, you need stringent laws that makes sure there is some mechanism to provide security to the women (*99% of rape victims in India*) in need.
cubenz on
> Changing that would be “excessively hard”, old men argue
12 Comments
You mean “excessively harsh” for men and not care squat for women.
Cave dwellers.
No. It would not.
How wild is it that a nuclear armed country still has such an archaic legal system?
Then you lose the right to go around lecturing other countries till you do.
[removed]
Talking about something being harsh? How about being the victim of martial rape and not being able to do anything about it.
Wtf is it with India and rape? It’s like there’s another horrific story every other week. Is this a media bias thing or is that region really deranged for some reason? Genuine question.
No means no.
Yes means yes.
India: But, what does it mean tho?
What a backwards country.
This is a terrible ruling.
While marital rape is still penalized fairly severely, I don’t understand the logic behind not allowing it to be reclassified as rape (*which carries even more significant consequences*). That is how it should be.
If you have a generation of men and women that aren’t literate enough to understand basic consent norms, you need stringent laws that makes sure there is some mechanism to provide security to the women (*99% of rape victims in India*) in need.
> Changing that would be “excessively hard”, old men argue
FTFY